Comments on: 模拟波动光学的非近轴高斯光束公式 - //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics 发布博客 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 02:15:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: 子奇 陈 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-38843 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 02:15:49 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-38843 In reply to 盛 杨.

对于紧聚焦高斯光束,如果考虑纵向成分,也就是计算倏逝场,在最大横波数中,设置为大于ewfd.k0的时候,目前对这种光束汇聚空间,或者说是相对传播方向的负空间没有很好的数值定义,所以仅能够对正空间部分,也就是发散的正空间进行仿真。所以焦点只能在边界。如果是不考虑倏逝成分,则可以焦点设置在场内,但此时有一定的误差。详细信息可以阅读该作者的其余相关文章。

]]>
By: 子奇 陈 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-38833 Tue, 31 Dec 2024 02:09:20 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-38833 In reply to 盛 杨.

你好,目前暂时没有模型可以提供。

]]>
By: 盛 杨 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-38643 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 06:00:27 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-38643 你好,有这两个对比模型的具体设置参数么?我这边设置参数,当焦斑直径小于波长,焦点位置只在边界

]]>
By: 盛 杨 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-38613 Wed, 25 Dec 2024 07:06:47 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-38613 你好,这两个对比的模型,有么?是否可以发一份给我,谢谢

]]>
By: 子奇 陈 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-37233 Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:23:00 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-37233 In reply to meijie li.

可以尝试:1.背景场公式,例如平面波乘上虚部的幅值衰减因子;2.边界模式分析,选择那些具有合适虚部的结果,或者已知端口的分布以及相应的复传播系数,然后在用户定义端口中设定。

]]>
By: meijie li //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-36953 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:50:11 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-36953 您好,请问如何在一个简单的二维真空板中激发一个复频率的倏逝波

]]>
By: 妙 彭 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-4983 Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:02:16 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-4983 In reply to Yosuke Mizuyama.

Hi, Dr. Yosuke
Thank you for your kindness help again. I see what you mean.
Best wishes
Sincerely,
Miao Peng

]]>
By: Yosuke Mizuyama //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-4943 Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:28:02 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-4943 In reply to 妙 彭.

Hi Miao,
I think you have to consider if the background field feature is appropriate or not for your application. We’ve been discussing under an assumption that you can somehow use the background field formulation by doing some pre-calculations. But it may be more appropriate to use the Gaussian beam boundary condition, rather than the (domain) background. We introduced the Gaussian beam feature in the scattering boundary condition at version 5.5 but it’s only the paraxial formulation. For your high NA case, you can use the integral formula that I wrote in this blog.
Best regards,
Yosuke

]]>
By: 妙 彭 //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-4933 Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:44:15 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-4933 In reply to Yosuke Mizuyama.

Hi,Dr. Yosuke
I am sorry to bothering you again.
But I still have doubts about your solution last time.
1. In COMSOL 5.5, does the plane wave expansion formula of Gaussian beam is transmitted in vacuum by default? So when we think about transmission in other media, we need to consider the refractive index of the media, right?
2. You said, “Calculate a rough spot radius from the above result, r = 0.61*lambda/NA_vac.” If my focus is in a medium such as water or air, do I need to consider the effect of the refractive index of the medium on the spot size?
3. In “ewfd” setting, the default value of the “Focal plane along the axis” of the beam is zero, right? If so, when the focus position of the tightly focused Gaussian beam is in the water, is the calculated “focal position shift” should be directly enter in the text box of “Focal plane along the axis”?
I am very sorry to take up your precious time to answer for me again. I am looking forward to your reply.
Best wishes
Sincerely,
Miao Peng

]]>
By: Yosuke Mizuyama //www.denkrieger.com/blogs/the-nonparaxial-gaussian-beam-formula-for-simulating-wave-optics/#comment-4923 Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:40:51 +0000 http://cn.staging.comsol.com/blogs?p=204661#comment-4923 In reply to 妙 彭.

You are welcome!
Best regards,
Yosuke

]]>